Jump to content

troporobo

Member
  • Content Count

    827
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    32

troporobo last won the day on May 21

troporobo had the most liked content!

Community Reputation

165 Excellent

About troporobo

  • Rank
    Great Hammerhead

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male

Additional Info

  • Show Country Flag:
    Philippines
  • Camera Model & Brand
    Olympus OM-D E-M5
  • Camera Housing
    Nauticam
  • Strobe/Lighting Model & Brand
    Inon Z240

Recent Profile Visitors

49715 profile views
  1. These are all wonderful, but I find the cardinalfish and pipefish images spectacular. Again, well done!
  2. I tried several options including the stick-on lenses and none were satisfactory. For years now I have a "bifocal" mask with no correction for distance, and love it. Have a look here: https://www.seavisionusa.com/ I don't believe it is necessary to have 1/2 to 1/3 coverage for the close up correction. Think about bifocal glasses on land. They have much smaller crescents for reading. Also note that you need the "bifocal" part only for gauges and tiny critters, but not for looking through a viewfinder, that works according to your distance vision and the viewfinder's diopter correction. This topic has been covered a lot here, a search will reveal more opinions and options
  3. Novus 3 is supposed to scratch your port. To remove a scratch, you have to remove material around it. Then get progressively finer from the (intentional) scratching of #3, then to #2, until it is polished with #1. The entire surface of the port will look uniformly hazy after the first step with #3. From your photo, that step looks barely underway, and there are heavy scratches that will take considerable time and effort. Maybe it was an error, but you originally wrote your sequence as 1-2-3 when it should be 3-2-1. It does work, but it takes a lot of elbow grease. Hope this helps
  4. Excellent images. Tell us about your lighting setup, it produced fantastic results.
  5. The full list of m43 lenses is here. It's pretty much limited to Olympus and Panasonic. There are also some from Sigma and some specialty lenses like Samyang for fisheye that are not listed. Note that m43 is not the same as DX https://www.four-thirds.org/en/microft/lens_chart.html
  6. I will start by saying that my equipment is not the limiting factor in getting better images, its the grey matter behind the viewfinder that holds them back! I see great images all the time shot on all formats. I'm a big fan of the m4/3 system in general and Olympus gear in particular - I've had three of them. I currently use an E-M1 mk II in a Nauticam housing. I shoot stills exclusively and macro with the 60mm lens probably 80% of the time and also use a Subsee +5 diopter which allows 2:1 magnification. The E-M1 has very good autofocus and decent continuous focus with tracking that I am starting to appreciate in some situations. The 60mm macro lens is super sharp. The m4/3 system with its 2x crop factor has obvious advantages for macro photography (and for wildlife, which I also do). The size and weight of the body and lenses are of course more travel friendly , but to be honest not a game changer compared to full frame once you pack the housing, strobes, batteries etc. For a benchmark, everything I need fits in a Pelican 1600. I have not used a full frame kit but I dive with people who do, and I believe that the IQ of both ecosystems is comparable. I will say that I have seen images from full frame systems that I don't think I could have made with my setup. This holds especially for wide angle. But I feel no compelling reason to change.
  7. Another vote for the Olympus 60. Great IQ, and with a +5 diopter you can capture really tiny subjects like anemone fish eggs. It works just fine in the port designed for the 12-50 zoom.
  8. Thank you all. I don't think it is a problem with the contacts as other flash units work fine and I am sure that it's not a setting issue, I have (painfully) become expert in the Olympus menu labyrinth. I like the idea of the Nauticam trigger but it is 4x more expensive than a new flash and I don't really need the additional features. It may just be bad luck, as failures are not discussed much on the various forums.
  9. This flash, which I need to trigger my strobes, seems to have failed completely and without warning. I know the hot shoe is working as expected because my above-water flash works fine. I have searched various forums without finding information on failures, but perhaps my Google-fu is not up to scratch. I know a few of you have this camera so wondering if anyone has had problems with the flash?
  10. I have one for sale. If you search the classified adverts for my user name you should be able to find it. I would do so myself but am on dodgy connection and about to go fully off grid in an hour. If you’re interested, shoot me a PM and I’ll respond before Thursday.
  11. Listen to tursiops! The 60 is a great lens, focuses quickly and is very sharp. I differ from his advice only in that I use autofocus, usually S-AF but if there is much movement from current or surge I will switch to C-AF. You can certainly use one strobe and get good macro photos but you will have harsh shadows. Video lights are not strong enough, once you stop down to get decent depth of field. If you're worried about the 60mm being "too much" here are two examples from a recent dive taken with that lens.
  12. Tim, thanks for the shout-out! Joanna, if you enjoy shooting WA, there are definitely opportunities in Anilao, but it is dependent on conditions. We generally get very good visibility from about December through March. But it can vary by site and season - we had fantastic vis 2 weeks ago. But now the rainy season has started so it's macro only until the end of the year. Good WA sites are Sombrero, Beatrice, Kirby's, and Saddle, and sometimes Bahura, plus the Dari Laut wreck. I am personally tending more toward close focus WA as a way to broaden my macro habit, and there are unlimited opportunities for that in Anilao
  13. I can't find anything about filters on any page. What am I doing wrong?
  14. Is there a way to show thread subjects rather than each individual post within threads when choosing Latest Activity? I liked this feature on the old version. The new version, which is much more visually appealing, requires a lot more scrolling.
  15. I was a regular out there years ago but haven't been in a long time. I can tell you that basing yourself in Gizo, Munda, or Uepi will yield all the opportunities for big pelagics that you could want. Grand Central Station near Gizo is great for sharks and tuna and is easily combined with a dive on the spectacular Toa Maru wreck. Uepi is known for the occasional hammerhead or tiger. Munda is in the middle of the Marovo lagoon and probably the prettiest spot for above water tourism. All of them are within a boat ride of each other so you can always do all the sites from any base. I don't have current info on the operators but I know that Dive Gizo is still there since the 1980s and still run by Danny Kennedy so he is a great source of information. In short it is a great destination.
×
×
  • Create New...