waja

PM sent.

Has anyone used an Aquatica Housing for shooting a Canon EF 16-35mm f/2.8 L II lens? I am trying to determine which extension to use. The Canon lens chart shows Canon Lens Zoom Focus Extension Canon EF 16-35mm f/2.8 L II USM 48708 AF only 48457 Canon EF 16-35mm f/2.8 L II USM *(2) 48708 19064 48464*(2) The problem I have is that the 48457 is 54.5mm and the 48464 is 74.5mm. There is a 48459 at 74.5mm. Thanks for any information. -Rick

Hi megtooth Thanks for the reply. It looks like the Aquatica upgrade while being available is not very popular. B&H Photo shows a 6-8 week time for receiving one. I'm guessing these are made to order items and not stocked.

Has anyone installed the Aquatica Housing Upgrade (20083-UPKIT)? I was wondering how well the upgrade works and how it compares to using the A5DMKIV housing. The kit looks fairly easy to install. Price is US$795.

SOLD

Price lowered. Make offers here or on eBay.

I have listed these on eBay https://www.ebay.com/itm/Pair-of-Sea-Sea-Sea-and-Sea-YS-250-PRO-Strobes/233102851705?hash=item3646033e79:g:p-EAAOSwaiBcROuS:rk:1:pf:1&frcectupt=true

Three years later and Zen now has the DP-100-ACR (with Removable shade). The mount is the same and does not allow the port to be locked. The Zen port is a cheaper alternative to the Aquatica when using just the Canon 8-15mm Lens. 2016 Retail Price Zen Port US$899 (extension not needed) Aquatica Port US$734 + Extension US$249 = US$983

Received Aquatica Mini Macro Port 18430 Also need Aquatica Focus Ring AQ-49015. Thanks,

Received Aquatica Zoom Gear 49001. Still need other items. Thanks,

I am looking for the following items: Zen Dome DP-100-ACR (must have removable shade) Aquatica Zoom Gear 49001 Aquatica Mini Macro Port 18430 Aquatica Extension 48455 (would consider 18455 also) Thanks!

I'm planning on using the Canon 8-15mm. I missed the option to have Aquatica remove the shade (or do it myself). However, with the Zen not needing an extension and thus one less seal along with the removable (and re-attachable) shade has me going in that direction. Time to see if updating the flat port at this time also makes sense. Thanks all.

I'm going to try using a 4" dome on my next trip and wonder if there is any preference between the Zen DP-100-ACR and the Aquatica 18410 Mini Dome 100? The Aquatica Mini Dome requires the 48463 Port Extension and the shade is not removable. Does the Zen DP-100-ACR require a separate port extension? Also, the shade is removable on the Zen and that has me leaning toward the Zen. Thanks for any insight.

Housing is now sold.

Camera has sold. Housing is still available. US$1200 plus shipping or best offer.