Jump to content


  • Content Count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won


r4e last won the day on June 19 2017

r4e had the most liked content!

Community Reputation

17 Good

About r4e

  • Rank
    Wolf Eel

Contact Methods

  • Website URL
  • ICQ

Profile Information

  • Gender
  • Location
    Southern Finland

Additional Info

  • Show Country Flag:
  • Camera Model & Brand
    Canon EOS-1DIV, Canon EOS-5DIII, Sony MC50E
  • Camera Housing
  • Strobe/Lighting Model & Brand
    Green Force various LED+HID, Salvo 200W HMI, 4xNorthern Light Scuba Supernova Mini, 2xNLS 300W LED
  • Accessories
    TLC and ULCS arms
  1. The bitrates for BMPCC6K are max 203 MB/s which is "only" 1624 Mbps, so that is less than with the FP and still 4x the data of GH5s. Thus 1TB disk would give you 1h 20 minutes of shooting time. If I multiply this by e.g. hundred dives per year, the total storage needed plus backups scares me. Obviously with this cost in mind, one would become much more picky of when to record and when not. I guess with a "cinema" camera you are supposed to plan and design your shots instead of just shooting opportunistically whatever you come across. Perhaps the solution would be to have a Paralenz or similar camera rigged on top of your proper camera. This secondary camera would be shooting the entire dive... Another possible solution would be to use the preroll feature of the Z CAM cameras. I have not yet tried it, but there is supposed to be a 5 second preroll. If you keep your camera generally nicely framed with whatever background scenery there is and hit record when there is some emerging action or the scenery otherwise is turning beautiful, you might be able to not miss any opportunistic shots. Plus, you could still shoot the planned shots as well. What I do like about the fp and Nikonos combination is its very small and travel friendly size.
  2. Great list. May I add: Europe / Finland: Cerella Oy Mail address: PL 1120, 00101 Helsinki Visiting address: Mannerheimintie 42 A 3 Phone: +358-9-621 3301 Email: myynti ( at ) cerella.fi Web: www.cerella.fi FB: www.facebook.com/CerellaOy
  3. I am wondering what is the point of the original question? Are you trying to avoid German value added taxes and EU import duties? If not, wouldn't it be easier to purchase directly from any of the many Nauticam dealers in Europe? The dealers pay the same taxes and duties. Since they typically order more than one item from the factory, there is some leverage on the international delivery costs. From what I have compared prices, many of the Nauticam dealers offer same/similar pricing as Nauticam themselves. Some offer even lower prices. Plus the European prices already include all the import duties in their prices whilst if you import yourself, you'll have to add them. Disclaimer: I represent Cerella Oy, a Nauticam dealer in Finland. Thus, my point might seem a bit subjective.
  4. Hi Nicool, I do not quite understand why you would want to have two vacuum valves on the same housing, "for redundancy"?. Installing two valves just doubles the risk that you might have a leak through either valve. Or do you fear that you cannot release the partial vacuum after the dive? Richard
  5. Hi Josh, I am technical diver as well. Maximum depth 103m/340ft and max penetration 860m/half-a-mile. My comments apply to Aquatica and Nauticam. Having serviced a number of housings, there has been only one single occurance of the Aquatica metallic latch opening unintentionally. The plastic Aquatica(Amphibico) latch with a rotating motion does not have that risk. The Nauticam latches with a red button and a lever are quite unlikely to open unintentionally since this would require simultaneous action on both. However, the risk of unintentional latch opening can be mitigated by a vacuum system that holds the housing halves together even with the latches completely open. Depending on model, the vacuum valve does protrude a bit and you might consider if this would increase risk of line entanglement or not - really depends on the entire configuration. For the ports, I advise using port lock mechanisms available from both vendors. Considering toughness of housing, the Aquatica models are a bit tougher. This can be seen on the metallic pushbuttons, trigger and various levers. The same applies to the handles and connection points of 1" ball arms. Please note that the larger controls have also a benefit when operated with thick gloves. I have heard that some cave divers prefer Aquatica for cave diving, but, likewise I know many cave divers using Nauticam. Perhaps the most important question is where to store the housing if you have to use both hands, e.g. gas switches during descent/ascent or pull-and-glide in strong currents. You definitely will want to protect the dome with a neoprene cover. I keep mine attached to a very short (5 cm) double loop bungee attached to the right handle plus a clip on the bungee. If needed, I clip the housing to my right D-ring. If the housing is neutral or just positive, it will float nicely under your right arm pit. Another choice would be to clip to your butt D-ring unless you have stage tanks clipped to same place. If the neoprene cover does come off, you'll easily end up with scratches on your dome. You might want practice clipping off your long hose on the same D-ring and emergency deployment of the long hose. Please note that some of the domes, especially some glass domes, might have maximum depth of 40m/120ft only. Finally, there is the question of lights. If you shoot stills and use strobes, you obviously will have light arms which will create additional questions of stowage and how to manage any squeezes. Alternatively, you could request your team to hold off-camera video lights for you. You'll need knowledgeable team members for this and some planning as well. Richard
  6. Hi Marli, Since you are still searching for an AD7100/7200 housing in, quote, "excellent shape", would you consider mint condition? We have one unused 20073 housing in stock. The housing is v1 and has dual Nikonos, but, we can retrofit either dual optical, or, one optical+one Nikonos without additional cost and hydrotest the housing at 9bar pressure. We also have the reinforced springs in stock. If interested, please PM me, or send an email. You can find our contact information from Aquatica's dealer listing for Finland, Europe. Best Regards Richard Eller
  7. Perhaps limited feedback relates to the majority of Wetpixel visitors being foremost stills shooters? Don't forget the older Blackmagic Cinema and Production Cameras with a Nauticam housing. Optional power pack with 3.5 hours of run time. SDI or HDMI out. However, sensor is only Super 35. However, it seems that the 8-bit Sony A7xII series with FF sensor has filled the low-end market thus leaving only the GH5 as a more-than-8-bit video camera. Personally, I was very much tempted to go with Magic Lantern on a Canon 5D3. However the unofficial pioneering nature of ML together with limited recording time and high cost of recording media made me hesitate. I guess there are many 5D3 videoshooters still waiting for Canon to launch a proper video camera in DSLR form factor...
  8. One of my customers did not remove the O-ring before flying and he then wondered why the back window had popped out during flight. Luckily it had. Because there is the risk that the normal pressurized air would just leak out into the underpressurized cabin. On landing, you would then end up with a slight vacuum inside the housing. Without a vacuum valve, you might try to release the vacuum by opening one of the spare bulkheads, if any.
  9. Disclaimer: I have no experience of the IBIS in the GH5. However, my former Sony MC50 video camera had an OIS that was able to lessen, but not completely eliminate, the slight swaying caused by fin action whilst shooting video and swimming at the same time. The Sony had couple of settings for the OIS and I shot test videos with various settings before I selected the setting that best matched my swimming style. I once forgot the recording on after a dive and got wonderful footage of the camera being handed over to the boat and then thrown under a bench. Thereafter the OIS kept compensating the rolling motion of the boat. PS. you can also lessen the swaying motion by performing much smaller fin strokes, e.g. modified frog or flutter kick.
  10. The optical sensor of the Sea&Sea strobes is known to have had sensitivity issues with various electronic trigger boards from different brands. You should try to maximize the trigger light emited to the optical cable, If there are small reflectors in the housing, try turning them into a position which gives the most direct mirrored route of the trigger light. Additionally you could line the top inside of the housing by some tin foil. This helped in one case.
  11. I guess you are using an Ikelite Y cable to connect from a single Ikelite bulkhead on your Aquatica housing to your dual strobes. A faulty Y cable or bad connection from it to the bulkhead connector could cause simultaneous trouble to both strobes. The next suspect is the internal cabling and bad connections. If the internal cables from bulkhead and hot shoe are connected to a small circuit board via pin-like connectors, try removing and reinserting the connectors. If there are DIP switches on the circuit board, carefully make a note of their positions and thereafter switch them couple of times back-and-forth before restoring them to their initial positions. You can check the (service) manual for the right positions of the DIP switches. Are you using the new Ike TTL circuitry in your Aquatica housing? Perhaps that is misbehaving? If you still have the internal cabling from an earlier housing, you could try direct internal connection from strobe bulkheads to flash shoe.
  12. If you plan shooting near the maximum depth ratings (of domes), using a vacuum valve system has its benefits and drawbacks. A vacuum valve will improve O ring sealing on the surface and very shallow waters (less than deco depths). It also will help you to avoid some common user mistakes and might provide some "peace of mind". However, for maximum depths, the partial vacuum (0.2-0.5 bars) will increase the pressure differential and consequently decrease the nominal maximum depth by as much. In other words, the dome might implode 6-15 feet shallower than it otherwise would. Secondly, the valve is yet another protrusion on your housing and thus slightly increases risk of line entanglement etc. Additionally, the valve itself is an additional leak point. If you do not close the valve fully, it might be airtight at the surface, but still leak at maximum depths. Finally, should your vacuum circuit alarm whilst at bottom, apart from turning the housing to face downwards, there is not much what you can do until returning to surface. With one or multiple hour deco obligations you can only listen to the continuous alarm and watch as the dome fills with water. Sending the camera with a SMB to surface has its own risks, multiple risks.
  13. Your Aquatica housing for the Nikon D7000 camera has a depth rating of 90m/300ft and it can be upgraded to 130m/425 ft. Finding exact reliable depth ratings for each of the dome ports is a bit more difficult. According to Aquatica, they test all their dome ports, macro ports and extensions inhouse to a depth equivalent of 90m/300ft. However, I have seen third party web quotes of using Aquatica housings even upto 700 feet. I personally have been shooting with the 8" acrylic dome at 80m/260ft depths and some of my friends have been shooting with Aquatica housings and domes beyond 100m/330 ft depths. However, you will need the stiffer spring update for deep shots. And I would hesitate taking a 9.25 glass megadome to these depths... For comparison, the Nauticam optical glass dome ports are rated to either 40m/130ft or 60m/200ft. Other Nauticam acrylic ports are rated from 45m/150ft to 100m/330ft including some special versions. And there has been a test dive to 500ft with the 4.33" dome. The Sea&Sea YS-D2 has a depth rating of 100m/330ft. For deep diving I would pay attention to clean setup of the equipment, e.g. no dangling cords etc. Make sure you can fold the arms and clip the camera away. I definitely would take the neoprene dome cover with me. For gas changes you can temporarily donate the camera to your buddy unless you have video light cords running to batteries on your belt. However, if the need arises, you have to be capable of ascending solo and managing gas switches on your own. That's why clipping the camera away would be a good choice. I also would prepare the camera whilst descending, e.g. perform WB adjustments and prefocusing a bit shallower but in darkness. If you plan to shoot wide angle video shots of wrecks in darkness, you will need a lot of video light. I have been using 2x80W LED video lights on camera arms and/or larger lights off camera. E.g. the video below was shot with only two 300W lights off camera. Getting your light assistants to illuminate the wreck suitably is another story... https://vimeo.com/120930016
  14. Hi Petra, My personal opinion is that it is not worth bothering with manual focus unless you have a tripod and you are shooting macro. Normally you would focus electronically by squeezing the trigger halfway. However, it is much more convenient to assign the focusing function to one of the other buttons, e.g. the '*' button on the back. You can do this from the Canon menus. Consequently you'll be able to do the slowish video focusing before the actual video shoot(s). Assuming that distance to subject matter is not changing a lot, you can then shoot one or more video shots. With a wide angle lense and a medium aperture like 5.6-8.0 there is some leeway in the well focused area. Something you'll need to avoid is unintentional focusing on the surface of your dome. This might happen if there are dust particles or scratches on your dome and any light hits the dome suitably. This could be avoided by manual focusing. However doing a manual focus when using the magnifying glass button (5x, 10x) is a bit cumbersome. Normally I perform a back button focus. If this is a critical video shoot, I'll shoot one still picture and check from playback with magnify that everything is in focus and thereafter shoot only video. Best Regards Richard
  15. Hi Petra, When moving from stills to video, the biggest change is the need to white balance already whilst underwater because 8 bit video has far less post processing tolerance than a 16-bit RAW picture has. If you want to keep your initial expenses low, you can begin by just using available light and manually white balancing with your Canon camera. Your camera will give fairly good color reproduction if you take a shot of white/grey sand or stone or even your own palm and then use the custom white balance feature in the Canon menus. Considering the light Spanish waters, you should get reasonably good shots upto 20 meters depth. Deeper than that, you might have to make compromises between accurate color reproduction and noise, especially in the red channel. Using your palm for white balancing will help a little. You'll have to be careful of not over compensating because then e.g. rust spots of wrecks might appear excessively red. The other route to go, is to use video light(s). If you are shooting just small fish and fauna, a smaller lamp of 2000-5000 lumens might be sufficient to restore most of the colors. However, for anything larger you'll need a lot more light, especially if you are competing with the Spanish sun underwater. I personally use anything between 16000 and 100000 lumens of video light power underwater because I shoot caves and wrecks in deep/dark waters. Something that I do regret is that I prioritized total lumens instead of good color rendering. In the market, there are very few video lamps that have a high color rendering inder (CRI) of 96 or higher. If I would be investing in video lights just now, I would definitely consider Keldan video lights. Earlier there used to be excellent but overpriced 200W-300W HMI video lamps, that had really excellent color reproduction, but, those lamps are very rare now. Concerning lense selection, it depends on your targets. A lense with a long zoom range might seem a good overall choice. However, the longer focal lengths will emphasize any unintentionally movement and shake unless you are prepared to use a monopod or tripod. A monopod or tripod will help a lot but you loose some flexibility. In practice, most shooters end up in having a wide angle lense and a separate macro lense.A 16-35mm WA zoom lense (or 10-17 for cropped sensors) is a fairly good choice. However, for video, you definitely will appreciate image stabilization (IS) in the lense. I personally use the zoom control only couple of times during a dive. Depending on subject matter, I normally select a focal length between 17 and 22 mm, hardly even anything longer. It is possible to learn to shoot video without an external monitor. This is assuming that you have good practice of focusing always before a shot. Pls note, that focusing in live view/video mode is much slower though! By using an external monitor with proper video features for focusing and correct exposure you can improve video quality a lot. However, a proper monitor will will easily double the size of your kit. If travelling by car or boat this is not a problem, but for air travel the monitor and video lights will increase your travel costs. Best Regards Richard
  • Create New...