Jump to content

Interceptor121

Member
  • Content Count

    2413
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    74

Interceptor121 last won the day on August 20

Interceptor121 had the most liked content!

Community Reputation

304 Excellent

About Interceptor121

  • Rank
    Sperm Whale

Contact Methods

  • Website URL
    http://interceptor121.com

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male
  • Location
    Woburn Sands, UK

Additional Info

  • Show Country Flag:
    United Kingdom
  • Camera Model & Brand
    Panasonic GH5
  • Camera Housing
    Nauticam NA-GH5
  • Strobe/Lighting Model & Brand
    2x Sea and Sea YS-D2, 2x Inon Z240
  • Accessories
    Too many

Recent Profile Visitors

59448 profile views
  1. White balance only works to a certain depth dependent on conditions this can be 0 to 12 maybe 15 meters Hues are more for secondary corrections of casts and tones once the shot is balanced They are not exclusive but complementary corrections Sent from my SM-A505FN using Tapatalk
  2. You need to take into account that there isn't such a thing as water color depending on conditions this varies a lot First RAW files are not as raw as it seems and actually the white balance when you shoot is important either with or without artificial illumination Second at depth you need light to restore colours hues are not nearly enough and act on the whole frame If you shoot with strobes you auto white balance and the hues corrections help tuning If you shoot with ambient light you need to apply the card in camera not in post to have latitude Sent from my SM-A505FN using Tapatalk
  3. Land and drone shots very strong The in water part is well lit the sharks especially mid water look good. Overall the only thing that I would change is the framing the lens I believe is a fixed focal length and in some cases too wide for your lights but that's being picky Sent from my SM-A505FN using Tapatalk
  4. Yes thats the array I wrote cxb3050 Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  5. Actually it looks like a cxb3050 that has a 90 CRI version The beam angle looks ok on the specs not too wide probably around 90-95 degrees in water? Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  6. Scott how have you measured the CRI the array does not look a creed high cri one? Sent from my SM-A505FN using Tapatalk
  7. I think you should see the strobe upgrade as a separate step The S2000 are great for macro and very close work but lack power for bigger scenes. I would upgrade the strobes as a priority and leave the 8-18mm aside. It’s an interesting lens but I would prioritise a 14-42mm and WWL-1 with a macro port more flexible option and easier to shoot. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  8. I would be interested in your findings as I have not found exactly the same. I actually use magic as wet filter but something else inside camera for stills Send me a PM pls Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  9. @lion2fish was trying to send a pm from tapatalk but didn’t work Oman is bluegreen towards a lot of green but wouldn’t use a green water filter What filter have you got? Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  10. Absolutely nothing the angle changes so in one case am shooting with the light in the other against the light so the image looses contrast the settings are identical. The shots at depth are in auto white balance the shallow one the clips is a cut of the same so the white balance is identical. As I said on the shallow part I should have used the filter that would have helped the hazy bits
  11. Subject to confirmation I have only 3 spaces left before the cut off date so if anyone is interested better hurry up Details are here https://interceptor121.com/2019/07/28/calling-out-to-all-image-makers-1st-interceptor121-liveaboard-red-sea-2020/
  12. That is exactly the point. The 0:38 part is shot without filter (as it was too deep and dark) around 25-30 meters so once you pass the area covered by the light the blue is really deep blue. The section at 2:40 is shot without filter with custom white balance. Here I decided to take the filter off when I was around 8 meters because it was not bright enough and I was shooting seascapes (not close ups) so no lights. I could have put the filter on instead I decided to leave it off and white balance. In hindsight this was a poor decision and I should have used the filter that would have got rid of some of the haze in the blue water cause by the reflection on the sand and would have given me more contrast. This clip I think is the demonstration of the fact that custom white balance on its own is not a good idea. When I try to balance the last part in final cut pro I used a LUT to give more contrast but the color balance was failing creating purple tinge What I should have done was to do the wreck with no filter and lights which I did. The first part of the second dive without filter and filter on the lights, and the last part with the filter. As I jumped in the water with the filter on I realised the scene was just too dark for the filter so all landscape shots were crap and could only save the close ups. Once I took the filter off to avoid ISO 1600 I trusted the camera LCD and it looked fine with custom white balance but it was not fine and the camera white balance on its own gave poor color rendering and still had some hues when hitting the surface. In those conditions the way to go is 1. Deep dive just lights auto white balance 2. Mid 9+ meters no filter as the camera was already hitting ISO 1250 and custom white balance ambient light filters mostly you can save close ups. 3. 0-9 filter as suddenly on the sandy part there was light and this was scattering the blue. As the bottom had fair bit of green etc the water so blue-green so camera white balance working poorly
  13. Erm I think divepro have no idea what they are trying to do definitely their bluewater filter is a waste of time haven’t looked to the others The clip sections are all with different techniques actually tell me which range exactly and will look on my notes Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  14. I finally wrote it all down it covers filters white balance etc etc https://interceptor121.com/2019/08/03/getting-the-best-colors-in-your-underwater-video-with-the-panasonic-gh5/
  15. @supawoot.t the -2 filter in fact takes 2 stops and the -4 four stops so that is the expected behaviours All filters take light off so this is not unique to keldan
×
×
  • Create New...