Jump to content


  • Content Count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won


Interceptor121 last won the day on May 31

Interceptor121 had the most liked content!

Community Reputation

423 Excellent


About Interceptor121

  • Rank
    Humpback Whale

Contact Methods

  • Website URL

Profile Information

  • Gender
  • Location
    Woburn Sands, UK

Additional Info

  • Show Country Flag:
  • Camera Model & Brand
    Panasonic GH5
  • Camera Housing
    Nauticam NA-GH5
  • Strobe/Lighting Model & Brand
    2x Sea and Sea YS-D2, 2x Inon Z240
  • Accessories
    Too many

Recent Profile Visitors

60476 profile views
  1. We don't know how it will look as it has not been released however it is capped at 12 bits
  2. I have it and I would like to sell it. Is immaculate with box. I don't shoot a lot of macro Giant Moray by Interceptor121, on Flickr
  3. Am referring to DCT discrete cosine transform compression which is what is used by BRAW and ProRes. The level of compression is mild so if you compare with H264 intra frame you need around double to achieve the same quality. I shoot 400 mbps AVCI intra and on a bench test they do better than prores 422 HQ at 800 mbps. I have clips deep down unedited and looks substantially better than your examples so I thought it may be the compression killing it. Looking at the BRAW specs I would not go below 5.1
  4. I played the files with BRAW player if you use a VFR mode the camera recorded bit rate still holds. So the files are recorded slow at 25 fps 328 Mbps that is a low value in general. You need to look at 650 mbps or 1.3 Gbps for good quality as the codec uses DCT and is quite basic compression
  5. I checked those files myself and they are a relatively low bitrate around 320 Mb/s. Is there a reason for that?
  6. Excellent and to the point @adamhanlon can't press like but it deserved it
  7. Has anyone entered general photography competitions with underwater images? (I mean not underwater photography competitions just general ones) I am interested in this as generally I prefer to create images that anyone not just divers or uw photographers like
  8. Yes I agree on the principle nothing is a must but most things are helpful Housing ergonomics are essential for example this Zcam set up that shoots RAW requires a monitor I wonder how that works underwater as the rig is taller than is wide? There have been posts here on RAW and how is going to be a game changer so I started looking into it, that does not mean I am fully convinced but certainly will have some benefits. I am also taking pictures so I am well aware of what raw can or not do. The thing that is becoming apparent is that RAW for consumers has limitations (12 bits) that make it more suitable to smaller formats such as MFT than larger that will then crop to 4K or loose the dynamic range they have in the process
  9. Yes there is a definition RAW is unprocessed sensor data at the bit depth of the ADC in the sensor. You then have lossless and lossy RAW. BRAW is none of either is just a video codec with high bitrate andapparently uses the same DCT that prores uses. It may have the headroom but it locks you down to a single product and vendor more than ProRes RAW does. In this respect is the same as proprietary RAW formats like Canon or ARRI but it is not RAW so really I do not see much point in this. I am not sure you can make a call from gopro to BMPCC if you have not used a camera that has it? I have tried all of them and IBIS has his merits together with the ability to make changes however this is not substitute for correct exposure and light All those things help Currently ProRes RAW is the only RAW lossy offering that is available at consumer level and is also very efficient as it compresses sensor data the bitrate are manageable with current equipment. One concerns are royalties only atomos is willing to pay them but their supported camera list grows everyday The only non pro camera right now that can go underwater and records RAW is the Zcam E2 all the others don't have RAW
  10. This post may be of interest. In essence the only thing that is RAW about BRAW is the name. It is just a video codec http://www.bmcuser.com/forum/blackmagic-camera/general-discussion/22868-oops-braw-isnt-raw--its-a-ycbcr-codec
  11. Braw is actually video not raw as it has already gone through demosaic and is only supported by their own program. It is also lossy and I am not sure I can back up most of the claims about the various format and the efficiency as their algorithm is proprietary and not documented so I left it aside. I believe being linked to a single brand and not able to go mainstream is a major limitation. Right now is unclear how much more headroom raw provides compared to a high quality video codec like ProRes 422 HQ and this is possibly camera dependant We need more footage and with cameras like Zcam and Panasonic S1H supporting it we should have a better base It is not possible to draw accurate comparisons with raw images because in camera jpegs are 8 bit and many cameras shoot 10 bit video that can take much more changes in post Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  12. There is one in classifieds Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  13. I like smaller housing and ultralight handles compared to Nauticam This is not an option for large rigs but for small ones is much better and the housing is much more compact Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  14. There are some serious issues with ProRes RAW and the nikon Z series http://blog.falklumo.com/2020/01/the-conundrum-of-nikon-z6-prores-raw.html Right now ProRes RAW is better on MFT other than of course ARRI and RED Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  15. I was quite harsh with the camera and this was due predominantly to an issue of moire Since then Nauticam has not sent me any product for review lol. The housing was really nice but it defeats the purpose of a compact rig. I would recommend you buy the camera first try it and then check out the housing. Most features can be tested on land
  • Create New...