Jump to content

l.babcock

Member
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Content Count

    128

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

2 Neutral

About l.babcock

  • Rank
    Wolf Eel

Profile Information

  • Location
    southern Indiana
  • Interests
    caves, Deep shipwrecks and,reefs
  1. l.babcock
    The GH5 doesn't need a red filter. It mwb perfectly without it even at depth Sent from my SM-T800 using Tapatalk
  2. l.babcock
    I don't use one. The gh5 white balance without filter even at depth Sent from my SM-T800 using Tapatalk
  3. l.babcock
    I mostly white balance off sand. I was amazed how the GH5 MWB at depth without lights and a red filter. If im doing close up work not macro then I will MWB with my lights on off sand
  4. l.babcock
    I have to constantly Manual white balance, If the sun goes in or out,and if the sun angle changes you have to readjust your settings.It doesn't work in Auto mode with accurate colors. Its just a lot more work then my previous Video camera. I don't understand all the settings or where to set them at. I spend more time adjusting settings then looking at the marine life. The plus, it takes awesome video when its set right, its lighter then my video camera.
  5. l.babcock
    Here is my first video with the GH5, it was a massive learning curb coming from a video camera. Im not sure i made the right decision for the money I spent https://youtu.be/_sZ0qsJv0tY
  6. l.babcock
    here is a link to some of the video with the GH5 https://youtu.be/_sZ0qsJv0tY
  7. l.babcock
    https://m.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=10211949960737186&id=1617326946 Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G935A using Tapatalk
  8. l.babcock
    I just got back from Dominica shooting the GH5. I fixed the focus problem with custom settings. I will post some video later and what setting I used Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G935A using Tapatalk
  9. l.babcock
    I bought GH5 with Nauticam housing, 7-14 lens, monitor, ect. It comes in this tuesday. Its going to be a learning curb since I have only used a video camera
  10. l.babcock started following Panasonic LUMIX GH5 for underwater video
  11. l.babcock
    I know, im in the water on a regular basis running trips. I just dont want to spend 12K and still not be happy. The only camera that comes close to the !dx mkii is the Panasonic GH5 at a fraction of the cost. I priced the 1DX package and its around 25K I can get the GH5 package around 10k
  12. l.babcock
    I heard good things about the Olympus. I'm changing gears about now. I just want quality video. it isn't on the small side,I'm looking at the Canon 1DX mk II. Sent from my SM-T800 using Tapatalk
  13. l.babcock
    My Friend has a Gh4 in a ikelite housing, it has been back to ikelite twice because after you get past 60ft you cant switch between video and pictures. I like the specs on the Gh4 I want to stay away from Sony, I have never had any good luck using their Manual white balance and in auto mode it doesn't work very well either. the LX 100 has some descent reviews, but cant find anyone who owns one for personal experience
  14. l.babcock
    Hey Guys, I am looking to purchase a small camera that takes good video and stills that has a good white balance capability. What have you guys used that has impressed you. Thanks Larry
  15. l.babcock
    Which camera did you use Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G900A using Tapatalk
  16. l.babcock
    It is different. Mine is a GP32a. I wanted by this weekend. I guess that won't happen. Lol. That was really the only reason I wanted to change cameras because I need macro capabilities on the fly Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G900A using Tapatalk
×
×
  • Create New...