Jump to content

ornate_wrasse

Member
  • Content Count

    673
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

0 Neutral

About ornate_wrasse

  • Rank
    Moderator
  • Birthday 02/08/1948

Contact Methods

  • Website URL
    http://
  • ICQ
    0

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Female
  • Location
    Oregon

Additional Info

  • Show Country Flag:
    United States
  • Camera Model & Brand
    Nikon D300
  • Camera Housing
    Subal ND30
  • Strobe/Lighting Model & Brand
    Inon 240Z (2)
  • Accessories
    Tokina 10-17mm, 60mm, 105mmVR, Sigma 17-70
  1. This may be too tiny to identify but I was hoping someone would know what it is. I have posted the image on my Facebook page as part of the 7 day Nature Challenge and I figured it would be a good idea to know what it is :-) In the image, the dive guide is pointing to the critter. Thanks. ellen
  2. Thank you both for the critter ID! Your input was much appreciated. Ellen
  3. Can anyone identify this critter? I saw it on a dive in Indonesia. I had originally thought it was a Flamboyant Cuttlefish, but looking at the image more closely makes me think it is clearly not a flamboyant cuttllefish. So the question is, what is it? Many thanks for your help. Ellen
  4. Thanks so much Allison, elbuzo and Nick! This will enable me to properly describe this critter to the camera club. Allison- Thanks for the link to the video. It was positively incredible watching that mantis shrimp spear (or club) its prey. I hope you don't mind if I give the link to the folks in the camera club. Kudos to those photographers who made a video of the action! Good to be able to describe the mantis shrimp in my image as the spearing kind. Elbuzo- Thanks for wishing me good luck with my presentation! Ellen
  5. Hi all, I'm giving a presentation on Underwater photography tomorrow evening to a local camera club, If possible, I'd like to know the ID of this critter. The image was taken in 2008 in Indonesia. I think it was taken at Wakatobi Dive Resort but it could have been taken in Bali as I also went there in 2008. Thanks in advance for any ID help you can provide. Ellen
  6. The two lenses are similar but, as I recall, the Sigma focuses closer than the 16mm 2.8. At one time, I believe it was preferred by Alex Mustard to the Nikon 16mm. But don't quote me on that! I used to own the 16mm 2.8 and I sold it. It's the one lens I sold that I really regret selling! Also, the over/under shots I've captured were shot with the Nikon 16mm 2.8. It worked great for over/unders with my big dome lens. You probably can't go wrong with either lens, but do remember that the Sigma will focus a little closer. That's my two cents. Happy shooting! Ellen
  7. These IR images are stunning! I especially like the first one. The focus appears to be tack sharp. For the second image, it appears you could crop 1/3 of the image on the right side, it doesn't add anything to the image overall. Also, the front part of the critter is a bit soft. I do like the dreamy look that the image has, however. What a great idea to take an IR modified camera underwater! Thanks for sharing these images. Ellen
  8. Ditto on the strap wrench. I have had difficulty at times and have found that a strap wrench comes in very handy. I actually went out and bought one online and now it goes with me whenever I go on a dive trip. Ellen
  9. You might want to check with Wetpixel member underwatercolours. She just got back from Truk in February and may have some advice for you as to what worked the best for her and the others on the trip. Ellen
  10. To give one example, I just sold a Subal housing for a D70 camera for $675. I bought it used at Reef Photo and Video for $1400. I'm guessing that the buyer paid me approximately 25% of what it had cost brand new. As it was, I recovered nearly 50% of what I paid for it. I can still remember a conversation I had with a well known underwater photographer a few years ago. His comment was that the older cameras still take good pictures. It's just that everyone wants the latest and greatest and are willing to pay the price for it. But if one is willing to go with an older camera/housing, there are a lot of bargains around. The buyer of my Subal housing got himself a quality housing for an excellent price. Although the D70 doesn't have all the latest technology, he'll still be able to take some darn good pictures with it. My two cents, Ellen
  11. You are spot on in your thinking that TTL doesn't function correctly in wide angle shots. The only situation where TTL works well is when the subject to be photographed fills up the frame, e.g. macro shots. For wide angle, TTL is definitely NOT the way to go. Manual, although a bit daunting to use to some who are used to TTL, is really not that difficult. It just takes a bit of practice. The results, in the end, for wide angle, are far superior to using TTL. After practicing, you'll soon know what settings (aperture and shutter) get you the results you want. Another poster has given you some great tips for shutter and aperture. Aiming strobes directly at the subject is to be avoided in underwater photography. It is the surest way to get a lot of backscatter in your images. I highly recommend you get a copy of "The Underwater Photographer" Fourth Edition by Martin Edge. There is a whole section about lighting. One of his tips, among many, is the following: "The idea is to avoid lighting the water column in between the lens and the subject. This reduces the effects of particles, and creates images that are cleaner, sharper and more colourful" Before long, you'll see big improvements in your images. Have fun! Ellen
  12. In that case, I'd like you to come to Portland and give a talk on the The Zone System
  13. Panatomic-X hasn't been made for years. Ilford Pan-F would be great for enlargements and I actually shot and developed a roll of Pan-F a couple weeks ago. Since it's such a slow film it's often shot using a tripod for topside shots, meaning a long exposure is often needed. When I used it recently, I was using shutter speeds of 1/8 of a second or more. If I hadn't used a tripod, there may have been a lot of blur in the images. I'm not sure that a film this slow would be good for the type of shots he wants to shoot. If you want to go with something similar to Panatomic-X you might choose Fotokemika Efke iso 25, a film made in Croatia. "Efke films are manufactured using classic emulsions with very high silver content. This results in a large grayscale reproduction. Unlike modern flat crystal films, which are very unforgiving to use, these films allow beginners to produce quality images. The nature of the film also easily allows large, grain free, enlargements to be made from negatives." Ellen
  14. I actually do a lot of black & white topside photography and develop and enlarge in the darkroom. Here are my suggestions for black and white film at ISO 100 along with comments: 1. Kodak TMAX 100 "Super tight grain, moderate contrast and an extremely long tonal scale are all characteristics of this superb film from Kodak. For those shots that require a high degree of enlargement, you'll be hard pressed to find a better film than TMAX 100. Best processed in TMAX developers, but can be processed in more conventional developers also." 2. Fuji Neopan Acros 100 "Fuji Neopan Acros 100 is a medium speed black and white film with rich gradation and outstanding sharpness. These features make it a good choice for a wide range of photographic applications including portraits, landscapes, architectural and product photography. Boasting Fuji's Super-fine Sigma Grain Technology this update of the older Neopan 100 has exceptionally fine grain yielding smoother and sharper textural depiction even under substantial enlargements." I have shot Fuji Neopan Acros quite a bit and I really like it. I haven't used Kodak TMAX 100 but a lot of people like it. According to the above comments, it's great for shots needing a high degree of enlargement, which would be great for you. The following films are black and white films at ISO 125: 1. Ilford FP4 Plus "Ilford FP4+ is an exceptionally fine grain, medium speed (ISO 125) black and white film. It is ideal for high quality indoor and outdoor photography, particularly when substantial enlargements are to be made. In addition to general photography, FP4+ is also suited to copying and internegative work, and has many applications in scientific technolical and industrial photography." 2. Kodak Plus-X "Here's a classic in an extremely fine grained, medium speed film with excellent resolving power, high acutance and superb detail in both highlights and shadow areas. Responds well to both push and pull processing in standard chemistry, for maximum ease of use. Highly recommended for general photography in moderate light situations." Hope that helps. There are many other excellent black & white films, but that should be enough to get you started :-) If you were local, I'd offer to develop the film and make prints for you. I'll just mention one fairly recent color film, although I know you wanted to shoot b&w. It's Kodak Ektar. It's ISO 100 but is very much like Velvia, in that it has very saturated colors. I really like it and I think it would work well for your application if you're doing color. I have shot a fair number of rolls with this film and am pleased with how it comes out. Good luck with your project! Ellen
×
×
  • Create New...