Jump to content

maractwin

Member
  • Content Count

    35
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

2 Neutral

About maractwin

  • Rank
    Triggerfish

Contact Methods

  • Website URL
    http://www.markrosenstein.com/
  • ICQ
    0

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male
  • Location
    Boston, Massachusetts

Additional Info

  • Show Country Flag:
    --
  • Camera Model & Brand
    Canon 7DmkII
  • Camera Housing
    Aquatica
  • Strobe/Lighting Model & Brand
    Dual Ikelite DS-125
  1. I use two different wide angle lenses with my 7DmkII. I would use the Tokina 10-17mm for mantas, as mentioned above. But I also have a Sigma 17-70 that I use, both on land and underwater. On land it's a good all-purpose lens. Underwater, with an 8-inch dome, it goes pretty wide while still giving me the option to zoom in a bit if the sharks aren't getting close enough or I want to control exactly how much of the reef ends up in a scenic.
  2. I put two squares of self-adhesive velcro (the hook side) onto the outside of the dome shade. That holds the Aquatica cover in place. -Mark
  3. The last two are: sand bass, Psammoperca waigiensis firetail dottyback, Labracinus cyclophthalmus
  4. I have both these lenses, and use both of them. I've done shark and manta dives where the big guys either don't show up or don't let me get close enough for the 10-17. With the 17-70 I can zoom in some, or go off and shoot other things without being stuck really wide. Yes, the Tokina is better for truly wide angle, but if you're not sure what you'll see on a dive, the versatility of the Sigma is helpful. But as long as I have the 17-70 behind a dome, even at 70mm I still don't really get close up "macro". But it's good for fish portraits and small reef scenes. -Mark
  5. I carry a Panasonic Lumix as a backup camera. Without a housing it is rated to 48 feet, but I've had it down to 100 feet. It's useful having a waterproof point-n-shoot on the boat deck. I've used it on dives where there were both macro and wide angle subjects expected: my SLR system setup for macro, and the Lumix in my BCD pocket for the occasional wide angle shot. It can't get me closeups of moving subjects because of shutter lag, and the onboard flash produces backscatter sometimes, but it is surprisingly capable. When I flooded my SLR on day 11 of 14, I was able to take photos the last three days with the point-n-shoot. -Mark
  6. I agree that it looks like a coconut octopus. However, I also think that the blue color might be an artifact of post-processing of the image. That precise shade of blue appears in the sand in each image, and in the third image you can see it clearly in the rocks and plastic behind the octopus. This is a color that is not common in environments like that, and is unlikely to appear naturally in so many places.
  7. I do use the Sigma 17-70 under an Aquatica 8-inch dome sometimes, though with a Canon 7DmkII rather than Nikon. I like the lens because at its widest, it is almost as wide as my fisheye, but it can also go tighter for when expected sharks and mantas aren't getting as close as you would like. -Mark
  8. We did a dive in high current, with instructions to get down to 60 feet as quickly as possible. So I was already that deep before trying to turn on the camera and discovering water drops inside the housing. By the time I could surface, it was already half-full of water. I'm not sure exactly what caused the flood. I'm suspicious that it might have been the vacuum port, but we were unable to determine for sure. The main o-ring was damaged by the time it got back to Backscatter, but I quit taking much care with the housing following the flood and the damage easily could have happened afterwards. This is the Aquatica vacuum system. Insurance paid for replacing the camera and lens, and overhauling the housing. I'm just back from my first dive trip since the flood. Things worked OK, but I am still unhappy with this housing. The strobe cables inside the housing can very easily come unplugged. I had one dive without functioning strobes, and twice more where my pre-dive check discovered that they wouldn't fire, so I had to open the housing, fix the cables, and re-seal it. With the door hinged so that it barely opens more than 90 degress, one time the door slammed shut while I was working on the housing, chipping the plastic latch. It still works for now, but I can imagine that breaking it beyond repair. -Mark
  9. The actual latch is fine. I have no question that it is properly latched closed when closed, and no concern that it could pop open. There's nothing to pinch my fingers (not that I had any problems with the previous latching system either). I have a vacuum system in this housing, but that's actually another source of complication that could fail. I had my first ever flood in twelve years of underwater photography with this housing. It was shipped with a defective vacuum system, and through mis-communication with Backscatter was unable to get it fixed prior to my first trip with the housing. So I dived without using the vacuum. The rest of the ergonomics of the housing I like. The shutter and knobs are easy to use. I've had no trouble with them slipping, something that I have seen on some other housings. The housing is about as small as possible with this camera body. I also got the Ikelite controller for true TTL strobe operation installed in the housing, and that works too. It's nice to have that option, though I still work in manual most of the time because I'm familiar with that and have more control.
  10. I don't like the new latching system at all. It is no longer possible for me to do a seal check with my fingers. I used to always run a fingertip around the o-ring, and the sealing surface, as I can more easily feel any hairs or sand grains than see them. With the new latching system, there isn't room to do this in several places. And with the back always attached rather than removable while open, the camera will no longer balance lens-down on the macro port with the back open. So I have to close the back repeatedly while working on the rig. If I did not have an investment in ports and other accessories, I'd consider switching brands. -Mark
  11. I just skimmed my photo library. I've got shots of this species from Komodo with a yellow tail. And from Fiji with a yellowish tail. The juveniles usually have a clear tail.
  12. I use the Canon 7D mark II as my primary camera, both on land and under water. I use an Aquatica housing. I upgraded last year from the original 7D. I upgraded for two reasons: the better focus system, and the GPS feature (useful on land only). It does focus faster and in lower light than the previous generation. As I have gotten older and now wear glasses (and dive with a prescription mask), I am no longer able to use manual focus. So I really depend on that auto focus, and want it to be quick and right. Another feature of this camera I like is the button to show a full screen giving all of the current settings. It’s an easy way to confirm that the camera is set how I expect it to be. And see what the mode dial is set to while inside the housing. I do a lot of fish photography. For that, picking out a small moving fish, I use center-sensor only focus in AI mode. As long as I can keep the fish near the center of the frame, the camera will focus on it instead of the background. I usually leave it in this mode for macro work as well, taking shots with the focal point in the center of the frame, then crop the photo later for more interesting composition. Sometimes I do switch to one-shot focus so that I can half-pull the shutter and recompose to avoid that crop later. For wide-angle work, I usually activate all of the sensor points and let the camera do its thing.
  13. I think this is a flathead, a member of the Platycephalidae family.
  14. That is a juvenile Checkerboard Wrasse, Halichoeres hortulanus.
×
×
  • Create New...