Jump to content

ajay

Member
  • Content Count

    99
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    2

ajay last won the day on September 24 2020

ajay had the most liked content!

Community Reputation

12 Good

About ajay

  • Rank
    Moray Eel

Contact Methods

  • Website URL
    http://iez152.ieda.ust.hk/index.html
  • ICQ
    0

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male
  • Location
    Hong Kong

Additional Info

  • Show Country Flag:
    India
  • Camera Model & Brand
    Sony Nex 7
  • Camera Housing
    Nauticam NA Nex 7
  • Strobe/Lighting Model & Brand
    Inon Z220s
  • Accessories
    Subsea +10 macro

Recent Profile Visitors

7355 profile views
  1. Love the Sea Elephant.. Could be a scene from a Japanese Ghost movie, right there. :-)
  2. Hi @Phil Rudin, is the 28-60 with WWL-1 solution available and good for A7R iii ? On the Nauticam website, I cannot find this option in their system builder interface (although I think they don't update this too often). Thanks! Ajay
  3. Very nice and clean setup, @JayceeB. Are you planning to use a wet macro lens also? Kind regards, Ajay
  4. That's a good point - I am not 100% sure about customs rules. My understanding is that customs do not allow batteries to be sent by mail across the border. I believe sending a strobe minus the battery, for repairs, should be ok. But your information may be more robust than mine). I also don't know much about haggling.. never tried that with my purchases (dive computers, housings, torches, which were purchased mostly via Taobao - which is Alibaba's China version of Amazon, or just from dealers here in HK). Kind regards, Ajay
  5. I have used the smaller (M2600-WSRT) X-adventurer for a few years, and it's just fine -- but I only do very little video. Also, I haven't any experience with other brands. I can however, add one point about repair. My lamp stopped working - and when I sent an inquiry to the company, they emailed back in a couple of days (their rep, called Gary; perfect English), diagnosing that the switch was malfunctioning and that I need to send it back to them for repair. I had the choice to ship it (at my expense) or send through a dealer (here in Hong Kong). I chose the latter option; the total cost including transfer (since I was out of warranty a couple of years) was ~USD75, and it took a couple of weeks. Kind regards, Ajay
  6. Hi Chris, that last question you asked is precisely what I have been mulling.. I was planning to try almost the same setup as suggested by @stuartv. Namely, the Sony A7C with the 28-60, and the WWL-1B; and carry my subsee +10 to switch to macro if required. But the more I think about it, the more I am convinced that It'll be better to have a separate system for macro (possibly the 90mm), and the wwl-1b for wide. Sigh.
  7. I suppose even if I go with the 28-60 option (as recommended by you), I might still get the 16-35/4 for topside. Unfortunately, fair price plus shipping for your one may might make it pretty much a wash over just buying a new with local warranty here in Hong Kong (~ USD 840). Thanks for the offer, though, and the very useful discussion! Kind regards, Ajay
  8. Hi @ChrisRoss it's indeed the newly announce WWL lens on the front page of Wetpixel. The conundrums are: 1. How much difference in quality between (28-60 + WWL-1B) and (16-35 F4 + 180mm dome): the former lens is worse, while in the latter, the dome size compromises the quality away from center. 2. With this WWL-1B, I _know_ that I'll be tempted to take both, the wide and the sub-sea +10 on many dives.. and it'll be a bit cumbersome to carry/switch mid-dive.. With the other setup -- decision made before dive (macro or wide), and that's it. ..and of course, 90mm macro might overcome all my lack of skills and drop some good photos into my card. Cheers Ajay
  9. Indeed, this WWL-1B is an interesting option for me, since keeping my travel weight low is very attractive. So far my plan was use the camera with the Sony/Zeiss 16-35 and 180 port for wide angle, but now this option looks nice also. Thanks for the update. Kind regards, Ajay
  10. Thanks @Phil Rudin. If the EVF is similar to the Nex-7, it should be good enough for me. Interestingly, when I first migrated from compact to the Nex-7, my biggest concern was whether I'd ever be able to adopt to holding the camera to my eye during a dive and using EVF instead of the LCD. It turned out that in practice, I almost never use the LCD.. In fact the main reason I want to switch from the Nex to a newer camera is for the AF. So it's also reassuring to hear your comments about that. Ajay
  11. Hi @Phil Rudin - the smaller size of the A7C and housing make it attractive to me, for sure. I wonder if you can share your opinion about one thing: most reviewers have complained that the A7C EVF is rather small. I've been using the old Sony Nex-7 in Nauticam for several years, and shoot exclusively with that EVF and no additional viewfinder attachments on the housing. I am wondering how these two EVF's (Sony Nex-7 vs A7C) compare (in the respective Nauticam housings): I mean, if the experience is similar, then I can avoid having to bulk up the housing with those optics attached to the back. Many thanks, Ajay
  12. The last trip I made was a _best of Maldives_ one, almost a year ago now. It was rather good. Cannot say about sharktastic trips - I would definitely be tempted if there are hammerheads to be seen, apart from the usual sharks. My report and photos are here. http://iez152.ieda.ust.hk/MALDIVES_19/MALDIVES_19.html Cheers Ajay
  13. Great discussion (I am enjoying Wetpixel live videos a lot, thanks @adamhanlon). @Alex_Mustard many (most?) images on your website with the 'night' tag show "No flash" in the info.. that cannot be correct?! Kind regards, Ajay.
  14. I tend to agree with @oneyellowtang on those -- I'm old enough to recall when the battle over computer monitors for CAD pitted the vector graphics vs the "raster is faster" gang (and those CD vs vinyl ones).. I think the conclusion from Adam, Dave and others that from current choices, DSLR cams would give a better shooting experience and results with not much compromise in the weight/volume of the UW rig - is correct. It would be great to hear when the OP @PhilW decides to make the plunge (and his system). My own choice, likely, will be a mirrorless, because I definitely want a lighter top-side alternative -- but one that improves upon my current UW system (Nex-7) by giving me better focus, wide-angles and videos. I shall do so with the understanding that I will sacrifice %-ages and UI underwater. Really appreciate all the advice and discussion! Ajay.
×
×
  • Create New...