Jump to content

Rommel

Member
  • Content Count

    3
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

0 Neutral

About Rommel

  • Rank
    Hermit Crab

Contact Methods

  • Website URL
    http://www.robertrommel.com

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male
  • Location
    South Carolina, USA

Additional Info

  • Show Country Flag:
    United States
  1. Thanks everyone for the advice. I really appreciate it, particularly with the explanation behind the recommendations. As painful as it was, I went ahead with both a Nikon 16-35 and a Sigma 15FE and plan on getting a Zen 230mm port (+ext for the 16-35). I won't have a 1.4x for this trip, but it should give me enough options to deal with the situation. I was leaning towards the 16-35 after Tim's explanation and with knowing how some zoom flexibility can really help composing very fast moving wildlife on land. While I often find fisheyes can look a bit gimmicky, I do really like the look of a lot of cetacean imagery taken with fisheyes that I've studied lately - I feel it compliments their graceful curves and the lack of horizons and straight lines makes the distortion less obvious. Plus I also felt the 15mm FE has some possibilities for some future astro imagery I have in mind. Any advice on white balance in this shallow, available light situation? Is shooting auto and correcting in post going to give great results or should I try and set a custom white balance? Would something like the Magic Filters give better results or is this not deep enough to matter? I'm eager to experience both white balance in water and to see how the speed of dolphins compares with some of the fastest terrestrial/aerial wildlife. Robert
  2. Hello all, While I'm an experienced terrestrial nature photographer, I am a complete novice with underwater so I could use some advice and the reasoning behind it. Let me explain what I'm looking to do and the gear I have. First of all, I'm photographing to print and print large. I print on canvas and metal a lot of times 5' or larger. With my terrestrial work, detail and sharpness has been one of the hallmarks of my work so it is imperative that I keep that as much as possible underwater. I will be on a liveaboard trip mostly snorkeling for dolphins with a few dives added in the Bahamas in the next month and that is my primary concern right now. After that I have short-term plans for sea turtles, alligators, and freshwater animals. Eventually I'm sure I will move into macro, but for right now most of the work will be wide angle and with a good amount of over-under in the near future. Budget is an issue as I just bought a camera and housing for underwater, will need a port/lens, and at the same time I am opening a gallery with my artwork. On the other hand I need to capture images of the best quality to print large or else it doesn't do me any good to save money. So my approach is to start with minimal gear needed to solve some of the initial situations and the increase the possibilities with additional gear in the future when budget becomes available. I'm in the process of purchasing a used D800 with a Subal housing. Keeping in mind the snorkeling with the dolphins, I'm thinking of starting with just a wide angle. I'm considering both the Tokina 10-17mm and the Nikon 8-15mm. I know the Tokina will only work from about 15-17mm without vignetting, but on the other hand the Nikon is really only either a 15mm or an 8mm and while the circular fisheye images look cool viewed on a screen I'm not sure if they make an art print (please tell me otherwise for anyone who has printed these type of images large). Also I have a D500 that the 10-17mm could work well with if a second housing was in my future but realistically that's won't happen for several years. The image quality might be leaning me towards the Nikon even with 2x the price tag. Any recommendations between these two in my situation? Also, is this the right focal length I should be using with the dolphins or is another range better suited? Without fully explaining my situation, ReefPhoto recommended a Zen DP-170 port. The $1000 price tag is much nicer than the $1500 Subal DP-FE4, but 170mm is only 6.7" inches vs the 8" of the Subal port or the 9" of a Zen 230mm. From reading Alex Mustard's Underwater Photography Masterclass I was under the impression that for wide angle shots a larger port is preferred for edge to edge sharpness and also for over-under work. Last questions are regarding lighting. I was considering trying to photograph with just ambient light since the depths will be shallow and I was thinking a bright sandy bottom would also reflect up a good amount of fill. Secondly, no strobes would give less drag for moving with fast-moving dolphins. Also, I know nothing about underwater strobes except from reading Alex Mustard's book and initial price checks look like it would add $1500+. Is my image quality going to be lacking without strobes either in terms of color cast or unattractive shadows? If I really should go for a strobe setup, would a single strobe be ok or are 2 necessary in this case for best results? I know I will be getting strobes eventually but if it won't make much of a difference in this situation I'd be happy to delay the purchase until I know more of what I'm doing. Thank you and sorry for the long post, Robert
  3. Hello all, Photographer from the USA here just getting into underwater after shooting terrestial wildlife and landscapes. Robert
×
×
  • Create New...