TheRealDrew 0 Posted May 18, 2009 (edited) University Park, Pa. -- An online photo-rating system developed at Penn State is the first publicly available tool for automatically determining the aesthetic value of an image, according to a Penn State researcher involved with the project. ... Users can upload their own images for rating or test the system by providing a link to any image online. The system provides an aesthetic rating within seconds. The Site Is Here I am not going to load an image, too scared of being the first negative score Judges and opinions are now moot. With Terminator 4 just around the corner, it may be more factual than we think For some reason I think I have seen similar things in the past(?) Edited May 18, 2009 by TheRealDrew Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jeremypayne 0 Posted May 18, 2009 (edited) Haha! I tried this: It got a 0.8 out of 100! I guess I suck ... I'll try some more ... ... and this got a 54.8 ... Edited May 18, 2009 by jeremypayne Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
TheRealDrew 0 Posted May 18, 2009 It got a 0.8 out of 100! I guess I suck ... I'll try some more ... Ouch. It is pretty cool thing, even though it is obviously wrong Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jeremypayne 0 Posted May 18, 2009 This got a 7.4/100 ... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
TheRealDrew 0 Posted May 18, 2009 This got a 7.4/100 ... Hmmmm. I wonder if the program is looking more traditional then out of the box. That one is worth more than 7.4 I would think. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
okuma 64 Posted May 18, 2009 This image won Best of Show, BTS, 1999 It earned 13.7 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
TheRealDrew 0 Posted May 18, 2009 This image won Best of Show, BTS, 1999 It earned 13.7 There you go. Figured the UW stuff could really throw things off (and started testing some of those). Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jeremypayne 0 Posted May 19, 2009 Some important caveats: "with 50 being the score of a typical average-quality professional photograph" "Full color photos are more suitable than black-and-white photos" Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jeremypayne 0 Posted May 19, 2009 This got a 92 ... been trying lots of different stuff ... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SlipperyDick 2 Posted May 19, 2009 Sheesh, you guys need to learn how to take better photos... this one is OBVIOUSLY 45 times better than Jeremy's first shot: 36/100!! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jeremypayne 0 Posted May 19, 2009 Sheesh, you guys need to learn how to take better photos... this one is OBVIOUSLY 45 times better than Jeremy's first shot: HAH!! Nice one. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
expatdiver 0 Posted May 19, 2009 Well at least the researcher is not gaming the system. Of three shots I tried of the Penn State Nittany Lion statue only one was rated favorably. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Cal 5 Posted May 19, 2009 "Sheesh, you guys need to learn how to take better photos... this one is OBVIOUSLY 45 times better than Jeremy's first shot:" !!!!!111 I was literally laughing out loud about that Cal Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
TheRealDrew 0 Posted May 19, 2009 Sheesh, you guys need to learn how to take better photos... this one is OBVIOUSLY 45 times better than Jeremy's first shot: 36/100!! LOL. Definately alot better than Jeremy's shot. Very even coloring. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
randapex 0 Posted May 19, 2009 Some important caveats: "with 50 being the score of a typical average-quality professional photograph" "Full color photos are more suitable than black-and-white photos" So of course I had to test this with a B/W photo: 75.2/100! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
TheRealDrew 0 Posted May 19, 2009 So of course I had to test this with a B/W photo: 75.2/100! Show Off Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Scubamoose 0 Posted May 20, 2009 "Sheesh, you guys need to learn how to take better photos... this one is OBVIOUSLY 45 times better than Jeremy's first shot:" !!!!!111 I was literally laughing out loud about that Cal Same here! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ce4jesus 1 Posted May 20, 2009 This got a 92 ... been trying lots of different stuff ... Of the stuff you put up...that one is the worst of the bunch. Love the tree abstract...wonderful shot. Sheesh, you guys need to learn how to take better photos... this one is OBVIOUSLY 45 times better than Jeremy's first shot: I just snorted my coffee...thanks! At least you know your sensors clean...I wonder what your score would've been with a dust bunny in there. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
TheRealDrew 0 Posted May 20, 2009 I just snorted my coffee...thanks! At least you know your sensors clean...I wonder what your score would've been with a dust bunny in there. The computer does not seem to like abstraction, a real bunny however scores 100% Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
MikeVeitch 0 Posted May 20, 2009 what about a playboy bunny? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
TheRealDrew 0 Posted May 20, 2009 what about a playboy bunny? 200% and fries the computer.... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
