mexwell 0 Posted July 6, 2009 (edited) Hello everybody! I just created a short comparison video containing similar scenes from both cameras. Of course this is no scientific test but I think it represents the real life behavior quite realistic. Actually it sums up two weeks of experience of filming with the 5D MK II. Befor I write my conclusions about the strengths and weaknesses of both systems, I am very interested in your opinions! Link: http://www.belowthesurface.de then click "Comparison HC7-5D MK II" in the menu. What do you think? Edited July 6, 2009 by mexwell Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hani Amir 0 Posted July 6, 2009 Impressive! The savings must be huge for someone who wants to take both stills and video if they go with the 5D mkII. What I'd really like to see is how it compares with one of those larger video rigs (not familiar with the equipment at all to name a model). Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jonny shaw 16 Posted July 6, 2009 How easy is editing the H264 files that it outputs? Do you convert to another codec like Pro Res? Also is the 5DMk2 limited to 3 mins of video clip length? Cheers Jon Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
mexwell 0 Posted July 7, 2009 Jon, unfortunately H.264 is not designed for editing and very sluggish to use. I am using EDIUS Neo 2 (thanks to Wags!) and am doing a batch convert of all the clips to the lossless Canopus HQ codec before I start editing. Then editing works like a charm! Of course it does, it is EDIUS ;-) Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jonny shaw 16 Posted July 8, 2009 How long does the conversion take and what PC power have you got? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
TheRealDrew 0 Posted July 8, 2009 Hello everybody! I just created a short comparison video containing similar scenes from both cameras. Of course this is no scientific test but I think it represents the real life behavior quite realistic. Actually it sums up two weeks of experience of filming with the 5D MK II. Befor I write my conclusions about the strengths and weaknesses of both systems, I am very interested in your opinions! Link: http://www.belowthesurface.de then click "Comparison HC7-5D MK II" in the menu. What do you think? Looks good, notice some shutter rolling, but did not know how much of it is compression/upload/chaning frame rates. Overall how did you find it work work (in other words would you carry the 5D in lieu of the HC-7, or still carry both.) I carry too much it seems sometimes, and I am about this > < close to the 5D. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Paul Kay 50 Posted July 8, 2009 I carry too much it seems sometimes, and I am about this > < close to the 5D. Its ability in poor conditions (I've had to shoot in as little as 2m vis for the program I'm working on and in currents too) with the 15mm fisheye is very good indeed. I'd go as far as to say that the combination in a smallish housing (I'm using a Seacam) makes shots possible that I don't think that I could have produced easily otherwise (and certainly not within budget). Its far from perfect but at the end of the day good content will largely negate technicalities IMHO. All this said I accept that my requirements are very specific and the issues I face are not everyone's. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
TheRealDrew 0 Posted July 10, 2009 Its ability in poor conditions (I've had to shoot in as little as 2m vis for the program I'm working on and in currents too) with the 15mm fisheye is very good indeed. I'd go as far as to say that the combination in a smallish housing (I'm using a Seacam) makes shots possible that I don't think that I could have produced easily otherwise (and certainly not within budget). Its far from perfect but at the end of the day good content will largely negate technicalities IMHO. All this said I accept that my requirements are very specific and the issues I face are not everyone's. Thanks for the info. Downloaded the manual to see how it operates in video mode. Looks interesting. It is really too tempting. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
mexwell 0 Posted July 10, 2009 Overall how did you find it work work (in other words would you carry the 5D in lieu of the HC-7, or still carry both.) Well Drew, filming those two cameras is really different. No autofokus on the 5D. Because of that you have to carefully choose the lens setup and "know" the DOF you can archive with your lenses and the aperture settings. Second, you loose a lot of versatility underwater. Just like DSLR photography. The whaleshark will aproach you right in that dive when you have the 100mm macro mounted. I had that excact event with my close up lens mounted to the HC7 when a 4m long Dougong joined.... Filmed a nice closeup of the mouth... ;-) Depending on your choice of glas you loose any kind of image stabilizing. This is really APITA at macro level work. You WILL need a tripod for 100mm Macro and beyond! In return you get superb IQ, great low light capability and the automatic white balance rocks. Conclusion: I will film the 5D, my wife enjoys the HC7. :-) Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
