Scubysnaps 9 Posted November 25, 2009 I am tempted to get one, my eyesight is probably one of the worst there is, have a lot of people thought of getting one but found they eventually manage? My D90 focuses in on the live view but it doesnt seem the quickest and a lot of the the button controls go redundant, viewfinder would be nice, but..hey I've spent a lot as it is! I can view my subject ok when I get used to it, but reading the settings is a bit of a struggle but then again I have the info screen programmed to the on/off/light button toggle, I guess I'll get used to it..or will I!? A 2nd hand Inon 45 could be a go-er or the Nauticam, the actual Aqyuatica's priced itself way out of the market for me, the others still are but.....hey! I wanna be comfortable taking my shot! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
adamhanlon 0 Posted November 26, 2009 I've got a 45 degree viwfinder on my Subal-and now that I am used to it-love it! It did take some adjustment-working out how to point the camera the right way! It gives a great view of the image, but also the info as well. Adam Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
decosnapper 34 Posted November 26, 2009 (edited) In a word - "yes". Composition is one of the strongest tools a photographer has. Being able to see what you create is important. Edited November 26, 2009 by decosnapper Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Mike L 0 Posted November 26, 2009 The new Nauticam 180 Viewfinder is one beautiful machine! having the external adjustable diopter is a huge benefit, and the only one of its kind. For $900 plus the cost of an adapter ring to your housing (Approx $30-60) it is also easily one of the best buys on the market! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Scubysnaps 9 Posted November 26, 2009 Thanks Mike, yeah Tim mentrioned the Nauticam one to me last night, and I've checked it out, I think 180 would be better than 90 wouldnt it? I had a go of Martin Edge's last Sunday, a bit of getting used to I think, but a lot easier to see. Why do they cost that much!!?? is it just because they know we needthem? Why dont they integrate them into the housings? Is there anyone out there who can confidentally say they can afford to buy one but they are happier without one? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Balrog 5 Posted November 26, 2009 What model finder does blibecap have in these posted pictures. http://wetpixel.com/forums/index.php?showt...mp;#entry225173 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Alex_Mustard 0 Posted November 26, 2009 What model finder does blibecap have in these posted pictures. Inon 45 degree. Alex Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
davephdv 0 Posted November 26, 2009 As a photographer and an eye doctor I can say; if you are over 40 an absolute yes. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Scubysnaps 9 Posted November 26, 2009 Thanks Dave. I'll wait for the shops to get back to me then with my enquiries. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Balrog 5 Posted November 26, 2009 Sorry to hijack this thread but maybe a consideration. Does either the Inon or the Nauticam present any obstruction in seeing the LCD. Seems they both project quite a distance below the eyepiece. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Scubysnaps 9 Posted November 27, 2009 Sorry to hijack this thread but maybe a consideration. Does either the Inon or the Nauticam present any obstruction in seeing the LCD. Seems they both project quite a distance below the eyepiece. No not at all Balrog, good question, there is also the Inon 180 to consider I believe Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Scubysnaps 9 Posted November 27, 2009 For people who are lucky enough to have tried both, do you favour the inon 45 or the 180 degree, basically looking down or at your subject? I see the advantages of both, but just wondered what people prefer? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Scubysnaps 9 Posted November 28, 2009 Could anyone kindly offer their valued opinion between the inon 180 and the nauticam? The 2 opinions I've had are different! I don't think I'll go with the inon 45. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Balrog 5 Posted November 28, 2009 I don't think I'll go with the inon 45. Strangely I'm leaning towards the Inon 45, subject to finding out how much of the LCD gets obscured. - Oh the second hurdle is sanction by the Chancellor Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
pmooney 6 Posted November 28, 2009 (edited) Irrespective of whether you choose the 45 Degree or the 180 Degree viewfinder from any brand you are still going find the LCD partialy obscured. Edited November 28, 2009 by pmooney Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Scubysnaps 9 Posted November 28, 2009 (edited) Irrespective of whether you choose the 45 Degree or the 180 Degree viewfinder from any brand you are still going find the LCD partialu obscured. Which leads me to big bucks aquatica Edited November 28, 2009 by Scubysnaps Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
james 0 Posted November 28, 2009 I guess it depends on the camera brand - the Canon LCD is not obscured by my Seacam S180. Nikon VF's are in the middle of the camera so are more of a problem. Cheers James Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Scubysnaps 9 Posted November 29, 2009 Thanks James, here's my take upto now on what is available, if anyone would disagree with any of this please let me know. From looking online and hearing several opinions about the inon 45 and 180, it seems to me that the 180's glass may be too small to view correctly and the 45 may obstruct the LCD too much and looking down on the viewfinder may not be good for wide angle. The only adapter i can find for the inon is a custom made backscatter one which is $300. There is also a dyron one but not yet available for the aquatica. There is also some difference in opinion as to the method of design of the adapter. So this brings me to Nauticam, but I do not see the need to have the ability to alter the diopter while on a dive, the Nauticam who make their own adapter for only $50, it too tho, is reported to block the LCD a bit, which would then lead me to the Aquaticas own viewfinder, but this is $1200, which while it is priced high it has no problems with blocking the view. I would prefer to not spend this much. But if the above is all true then maybe I have not much choice other than Aquatica. Or have I!? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Scubysnaps 9 Posted December 1, 2009 I have just ordered an Aquatica Aquaview ...hope I get it in time for my Manado Chistmas trip!!!!! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Balrog 5 Posted December 1, 2009 Well done on making the decision . I'm still hovering. Do let us know how it works out. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Scubysnaps 9 Posted December 1, 2009 indeed! we should meet up for a dive one day, I can show you....I'm at Portland on the 12th, dont suppose I'll have the viewfinder then tho Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ErolE 3 Posted December 2, 2009 What about viewfinders as weak points? I have seen one flooded aquatica housing due to the front element becoming displaced on the viewfinder. Has anyone experienced this or was that a one off? Erol Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Scubysnaps 9 Posted December 15, 2009 (edited) What a beautiful piece of engineering this really is couple of quick photos on my way out this morning Many thanks again to Dave at Backscatter for getting this to me ...as well as my WP T shirt Edited December 15, 2009 by Scubysnaps Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
