Nikon D5 in Nikon D4S housings

[Alex_Mustard 0]

Nikon are expected to launch the Nikon D5 at the start of 2016. It is expected to be a 20MP replacement for the 16MP Nikon D4S.

 

When Nikon replaced the D3 with the D4 they received a lot of criticism from press/sports photographers (the intended market for the camera) because they made a host of minor layout changes to the main controls on the camera body. This is a problem for the photojournos because they will often shoot 2-5 bodies at the same time (each with different lenses) and want to be able to swap between them seamlessly. When a new camera comes out they want to be able to use it side by side with their existing cameras.

 

When Nikon released the Nikon D4S they went to pains to point out that it has identical controls to the D4 - seeing this as a major selling point.

 

For this reason I have been hoping that the Nikon D5 will be physically identical to the D4S in terms of the layout of its major controls. And therefore would fit into Nikon D4S housings. Something I am personally interested it - as I use a D4S housing!

 

------

 

UPDATE. Yesterday Nikon Rumours posted some leaked photos of a "Nikon D5"

 

http://nikonrumors.com/2015/12/14/the-upcoming-nikon-d5-dslr-camera-will-have-a-20-mp-sensor-plus-more-leaked-d5-pictures.aspx/

 

I have never put much stock in what Nikon Rumors say, well not since I had a pre-production Nikon D800 in my hand and read their inaccurate speculation about the “forthcoming” Nikon D800.

 

However, their Nikon D5 photos look pretty legit to me. I think that they are officially leaked by Nikon to raise some hype for the D5 (not the best week to do it when everyone is focussed on The Force Awakens!) - which is why there is a Sigma lens on it - Nikon trying to be clever!

 

http://nikonrumors.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/12/Nikon-D5-camera-leaked-1.jpg

 

http://nikonrumors.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/12/Nikon-D5-camera-leaked-4-550x479.jpg

 

The photos do indeed suggest a very similar chassis to the D4s. Which bodes well. There are some extra Function Buttons that are in new positions and the ISO button has been moved - which I believe it had to. I even commented in my UW Nikon D4 review that this important control was easier to use through the housing than on the camera body (which is dumb design by Nikon for a function that so defines the camera).

 

From a quick scan of the images, I look forward to trying it in a housing. The ISO button and function buttons looks the main hitches. But I would also expect the camera to have a high degree of button customisation - and I would be very surprised that ISO could not be reprogrammed to another button.

 

All that may be wishful thinking. As so often Nikon have put some bulge somewhere on the camera body that inadvertently scuppers using it in an existing housing!

 

Alex

 

p.s. Long term I would likely get a dedicated housing for the D5, just because of the workload it will get, but it would be great to have 95% functionality from the release of the camera using the old housing.

[vbpress 4]

At first look, inspite of the few images to see, it's quite hard to suppose that the new nikon flagship camera can be fitted in D4 housing 'cause there are more differences by D4-D5 cameras than in the previus D3-D4. The main body at right and left of the prism appears higher than in D4 design and we know that few mm can make the differences.

I hope I'm wrong, but at this moment only housing manufacturer can be happy: new business opportunity in the horizon offered by nikon R&D dep.

[adamhanlon 0]

I don't think it is going to work

 

Here are side by side comparisons:

 

 

Camersize.com has a useful comparison.

 

http://camerasize.com/compare/#543,649

 

Adam

[Pedro Carrillo 2]

Hi,

 

carefully looking at this since my D4 got stolen and I have an empty D4 Seacam housing

 

Taking Adam´s measures as a guideline to resize images of both cameras (all same length, 160mm, with about 1 mm discrepancy on the height -back view- and width -top view-), I would say that chances to keep access to most of the controls are high with a bit of rerouting and provided your housing has some room (as Seacam does).

 

Seems like movie rec button would be lost (bigger changes are on top buttons close to the shutter) and front dial wheel might need minor work, together with a slight displacement of buttons on the back

 

My call? Not impossible but work-intensive

 

Pedro

 

 

 

Edited January 9, 2016 by Pedro Carrillo

[adamhanlon 0]

Great work Pedro!

[Pedro Carrillo 2]

Thanks, Adam, due homework before burning +6000USD

 

I just have realized that, instead of the bottom of the cameras, I should have aligned the viewfinders in order to ensure the lens is perfectly centered in the housing front port opening (assuming proportion between viewfinder and center of the lens mount will not change, that I think is a fair assumption).

 

The outcome is that by lowering the camera plate in the housing to accommodate the 2 additional milimeters of the D5, all the relevant back controls should be actionable (even live view!)

 

On top we only need to modify the access to ISO (the back and front wheels can change exposure compensation in modes A and S) so definitively this starts to look good!

 

Pedro

 

Edited January 10, 2016 by Pedro Carrillo

[Alex_Mustard 0]

A friend of mine tried his D5 (pre-production) in his D4 housing (a Subal) and it does not fit. It is a few mm too big.

 

So housing manufacturer's will be happy. Photographers less so.