Jump to content
max_oo

Micro 4/3 with Wet WA for Comapact

Recommended Posts

Hi,

 

If my housing has 67 mm thread can I use and WA adapter ( like dyron super wide angle lens 13 mm) with stock 14-42 lens from Olympus E-M10 ?

 

What would be the limits ( vignetting, lack of sharpness, focusing) compared to a real wide angle lens with a proper dome ?

 

What about macro diopter to use with this stock lens ?

 

I'd like to have the versatile and compact ( shooting WA and macro on the same dive) and quality of DSLR sensor.

 

Is this possible ?

Thanks

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Macro diopters will certainly work with that lens. I don' shoot WA so don't know for sure about your first question, but for example Nauticam says their WWL will work with that lens too

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Nauticam's WWL-1 is your best bet for WA, just search around wetpixel (I don't have one yet but its on the list). For Macro you have multiple options, I personally use a ucl-165.

Edited by tamas970

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I know this is a bit of necromancy, but I have the same question as the OP and it doesn't seem like it has been answered.

 

Will a Dyron SWAL work well with an OM-D E-M10?

 

All the stores I see selling the SWAL only talk about using it with cameras with smaller sensors. Except for one that says with a G16, the FOV will be 100 degrees, instead of 130.

 

That all leads me to wonder if the SWAL is useful on a m43 sensor. What will the FOV be?

 

I'm starting to think it would simply not be a smart purchase to use with a m43 camera.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Get the Nauticam version, for sure it will work with EM-10 (for the right lens). To the OP, I guess that what you want (small camera, completely versatile on a single dive and quality of DSLR) is very unlikely. I shoot the EM1-II and like it a lot, but it is not quite the same quality of a DSLR. Also, when you think of wet lenses, they are never quite as good as a prime lens in the appropriate port.

 

Cheers

Bill

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Get the Nauticam version, for sure it will work with EM-10 (for the right lens). To the OP, I guess that what you want (small camera, completely versatile on a single dive and quality of DSLR) is very unlikely. I shoot the EM1-II and like it a lot, but it is not quite the same quality of a DSLR. Also, when you think of wet lenses, they are never quite as good as a prime lens in the appropriate port.

 

Cheers

Bill

 

While I appreciate you taking the time, your reply is not really very helpful. I specifically asked about the SWAL. It is a LOT less expensive than the WWL-1. I want to know about the SWAL. I know the WWL-1 would be better, but I am not prepared to spend that much money on a lens for my (old) E-M10. I can't find a used WWL-1 anywhere. I can get a used SWAL for roughly $250.

 

Also, the same suggestion (for a WWL-1) was already posted in this thread.

 

And, the OP is over 2 years old, so he has probably already made his decision.

 

I don't mean to sound like a jerk (and I know this is probably coming across that way, for which I apologize). I'm just saying that I asked specifically whether a SWAL will work (decently) on an E-M10. I don't need suggestions for a lens that will cost me 4X as much. I already know about that one. That is not my question.

 

If were really thinking of spending over $1K on a WWL-1, I would start be getting a better camera and a Nauti WACP (even better than a WWL-1).

 

I'm just looking for something not too expensive that might be better than the Meikon WA wet dome I am using now. And, at this point, I think the SWAL is probably not it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

While I appreciate you taking the time, your reply is not really very helpful. I specifically asked about the SWAL. It is a LOT less expensive than the WWL-1. I want to know about the SWAL. I know the WWL-1 would be better, but I am not prepared to spend that much money on a lens for my (old) E-M10. I can't find a used WWL-1 anywhere. I can get a used SWAL for roughly $250.

 

Also, the same suggestion (for a WWL-1) was already posted in this thread.

 

And, the OP is over 2 years old, so he has probably already made his decision.

 

I don't mean to sound like a jerk (and I know this is probably coming across that way, for which I apologize). I'm just saying that I asked specifically whether a SWAL will work (decently) on an E-M10. I don't need suggestions for a lens that will cost me 4X as much. I already know about that one. That is not my question.

 

If were really thinking of spending over $1K on a WWL-1, I would start be getting a better camera and a Nauti WACP (even better than a WWL-1).

 

I'm just looking for something not too expensive that might be better than the Meikon WA wet dome I am using now. And, at this point, I think the SWAL is probably not it.

There is a reason you don't find used WWL-1s. People who buy them love them, and keep them for their next camera.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't have the SWAL but the tests from Bluewater suggest that it will vignette a bit on the EM-10. I am sure that you can find a zoom setting where vignetting is not appreciable, but for a micro 4/3 sensor it will probably not be as wide as it will be on a compact sensor. as for the WACP, it probably won't work very well except on full frame cameras. BUT the results that I have seen from that lens are quite nice (a bit pricey though).

CHeers

Bill

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Here is a vote for the WWL-1. Find the money to buy it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't have the SWAL but the tests from Bluewater suggest that it will vignette a bit on the EM-10. I am sure that you can find a zoom setting where vignetting is not appreciable, but for a micro 4/3 sensor it will probably not be as wide as it will be on a compact sensor. as for the WACP, it probably won't work very well except on full frame cameras. BUT the results that I have seen from that lens are quite nice (a bit pricey though).

CHeers

Bill

 

Thanks. That is kind of the conclusion I was coming to. (that it won't work very well) What I read was that it gives 130 degree FOV on a 1/1.7" (?) sensor. It only gives about 100 on some other sensor that is bigger. I guess that means it will be even less FOV on a m43 sensor. No bueno.

 

Yes, at least for the moment, it seems the WACP is only for full frame cameras. But, that is where I see myself going. I was only considering a new dome (to replace the one I'm using now) as a stopgap in the meantime. Which is why I don't want to spend $1100 on a new WWL-1. If I were to come across a used one, I would grab it. I just thought it might be possible that the SWAL would follow the 80/20 rule - 80% as good for 20% of the price (used).

 

Thanks, all, for the input. I will not pursue the SWAL.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sponsors

Advertisements



×
×
  • Create New...