Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
bear35

Nikon Comparison D500 vs D7200

Recommended Posts

Hi guys,

 

Looking for some advice on my pending upgrade...

In a nut shell, do you think the extra money for the d500 is worth spending over the d7200?

Or as I am moving from 4/3 set up anything else out there worth thinking about?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The extra money in the whole system price is quite small, so worth it.

 

But if you can find a secondhand D7200 system, then that would be very attractive.

 

Alex

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,
i have the D7100 for above water, and bought the D500 last autum.
Since then, the D7100 rest a lot ;-))

Have now a Hugy housing and except triggering the strobes, its great!!!
Specially the low light possibilities.

Regards,
Wolfgang

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I would venture that it depends on your finances and your ability to rationalize spending.
I bought used, I bought a refurb D7000 and used housing for several reasons, limited income, not planning to sell photos, and I could easily buy another D7000 for much less than my other camera, a D750.

And I doubt that you would really see the quality difference.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Cameras tend to be the cheapest part of an uw system to a large degree. As Alex said, the overall percentage to step it up to the D500 is fairly small.

 

The D500 is much faster, and has faster AF, especially for action and low-light with a host of other electronic improvements, besides a better sensor.

 

The other financial reality is that you are buying the latest technology and your resale later on is also going to be much higher (and easier to sell). You'll end up recouping much of the difference then.

 

Thanks,

Jack

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,
the difference between D7100 and D500 is easy to see.
Sharpness with the same lenses, if i mount a long tele lens on its tripod rest, and change the camera, you will find out which was it...
Low light pics, autofocus and Speed.

Only the built in flash is missing.

The question is what you want and need...
And can afford, as well. And the D500 was a big Investment for me too. But sold my two D300 bodies, and a housing and some other stuff for it...

But the D7200 is said to be much better in image quality than the D7100.

Had tried a D610 as well, but autofocus was to slow in low light.

Regards,
Wolfgang

PS: Jack was quicker ;-))

Edited by trimix125
  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have had the D7000, D7100, D7200 and now the D500. The biggest difference has been focus ability. From the D7000 being quite poor at focus, the D7100 a lot better focus and significantly better images. The D7200 better focus then the D7100 and slightly better image quality. The focus ability of the D500 blows them all out of the water, it is fantastic. Image quality is similar to the D7200 until you start jacking the ISO up, then the D500 is a lot better.

 

My take on these four cameras is that if you can't get in focus in a reasonable amount of time it sucks. The D7200 is a fine camera, focuses fast and in low light. The D500 is just a little better all the way around.

 

The D500 has no onboard flash. Not sure if that is a handicap or not. I have a Nautical housing for it with onboard flash triggers, the recycle time is no longer camera dependent, crazy fast.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I upgraded from a D7000 to the D500 mainly due to the excellent buffer of the D500 and its ability to due custom WB settings on liveviwe for video. Again as others stated it depends on your real budget and what type of shooting you mainly doing. The D7200 is still a very capable camera and might be an option worth considering if you can get the housing/body at the right price.

 

Regards Mark

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for everyones comments.

It boils down to if the improvements are worth spending the extra £900 ($1100) on the body. It would seem most people think yes then as no one has said they would stick with the 7100/7200.

Looks like I have some more saving to do!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

When i bought my D500 (upgrading from D300s) it was mostly the AF capabilities in low light which drove me.

It's a pity that the reputable photo magazines i read are not assessing these capabilities. In fact, their test benches for AF ability to track subject is definitely used with good ambient lighting, and fails to spot differences between recent cameras.

Then one has to trust camera specs, which say D500 focuses in darker environments than D7200.

For my photography this is very useful, esp when shooting below rocks where i can barely see but i noticed focus light (even red light) does disturb subject.

The D500 amazes me with shots i succeed in those conditions, and i just know by the specs that D7200 wouldn't succeed in as manu shots. How big is the difference, that i don't know :-/

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Sign in to follow this  

Sponsors

Advertisements



×
×
  • Create New...